Senate Bill 330 Housing Crisis Act Explained

BRIDGE Housing, Bay Area, TRI Commercial, Northern California, San Francisco, Bay Area, East Bay

By Steven Vettel and Charles “CJ” Higley

California Gov. Gavin Newsom recently signed into law several housing-related bills passed in the 2019-2020 state legislative session. At the start of the session, a whopping 200 housing-related bills were introduced, mostly from Bay Area legislators. Many of these proposals were part of the “CASA Compact,” a multi-year, multi-stakeholder effort to address the housing crisis from a Bay Area regional standpoint, a particular pain point for the region.

The CASA Compact framework is based around three principal outcomes: (1) production of housing at all levels of affordability; (2) preserving existing affordable housing; and (3) protecting vulnerable households from housing instability and displacement. At the end of the legislative session, about a dozen housing bills survived the lawmaking process, ending up on Newsom’s desk. As the new laws begin to take effect this year, here is a deeper dive into Senate Bill 330, the “Housing Crisis Act.”

Vettel

The Housing Crisis Act (SB 330), sponsored by Senator Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley), seeks to eliminate some of the most common entitlement impediments to the creation of new housing, including delays in the local permitting process and cities enacting new requirements after an application is complete and undergoing local review—both of which can exacerbate the cost and uncertainty that sponsors of housing projects face. While this new law should prove helpful for developers, it is only temporary in nature, since the bill’s provisions expire on Jan. 1, 2025. The new law:

  1. Requires local governments to complete their review and approval processes for housing development within certain time periods.
  2. Restricts local agencies from applying new standards, policies and laws to a development after a project sponsor submits a complete preliminary application.
  3. Restricts local governments from enacting policies, standards or conditions, such as housing moratoria, that would limit housing development.

Application Processes and Timelines

Under the Housing Crisis Act, cities and counties are prohibited from conducting more than five hearings in connection with a housing project approval if the project complies with the applicable objective general plan and zoning standards in effect at the time an application is deemed complete.

The new law also reduces the amount of time that a local government has to approve or disapprove an application under the Permit Streamlining Act from 120 to 90 days for a housing project that requires California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, and from 90 to 60 days if a housing project is proposing at least 49 percent affordable units.

Higley

Additionally, local agencies are prohibited from disapproving housing development projects for very low, low-, or moderate-income households unless they make certain written findings. The same will apply if a local agency either disapproves a project or imposes a condition of approval that lowers the density for a project that complies with the applicable objective general plan, zoning and subdivision standards in effect at the time that the application was deemed complete.

If a proposed housing project is not consistent with or in compliance with local standards, local agencies must provide the applicants with written documentation identifying and explaining why the proposed project is not in compliance within specified timeframes. The bill also clarifies that a project’s use of the State Density Bonus Law shall not constitute a valid basis on which to find that a proposed housing project is inconsistent, not in compliance or not in conformity with objective standards.

Prohibition on New Standards

Once a project sponsor submits a preliminary application containing all of the required information, a local agency will be prohibited from applying new ordinances, policies and standards to a proposed project, subject to certain exceptions.

Additionally, the Housing Crisis Act allows a project applicant, a person who would be eligible to apply for residency in the proposed project or a housing organization to file a lawsuit if a local agency requires a housing project to comply with a new ordinance, policy or standard that was not adopted and in effect when a preliminary application was submitted.

Restrictions on Local Government

On land where housing is an allowable use, cities and counties are now prohibited from enacting changes that would have the following effects:

  • Reduce the intensity of land use to levels below what was permitted by the city or county as of Jan. 1, 2018 by changing the general plan land use designation, specific plan land use designation or zoning of a parcel.
  • Impose a moratorium or similar restriction or limitation on housing development, unless the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) approves it.
  • Impose or enforce new design review standards established after Jan. 1, 2020, if the standards are not objective.
  • Cap the number of housing units that can be approved or constructed either annually or for some other period of time (unless the limit was approved by voters prior to Jan. 1, 2005 and the city or county is located in a predominantly agricultural county).
  • Limit the population of the city or county.

While the above restrictions on local government will be beneficial to new housing development, the Housing Crisis Act places additional requirements on projects that involve the demolition of existing residential units. It requires that cities and counties may only approve housing developments that include the demolition of residential units if the project will create at least as many residential dwelling units as will be demolished.

For projects involving the demolition of protected units, cities and counties may only give their approval if the projects meet the following criteria:

  1. The project will replace all existing or demolished protected units (which would count towards meeting inclusionary housing requirements).
  2. The project will include at least as many residential dwelling units as the greatest number of residential dwelling units that existed on the project site within the last five years.
  3. Existing residents, if any, are allowed to occupy their units until six months before the start of construction.
  4. The developer agrees to provide to the affordable housing rental unit occupants relocation benefits and a right of first refusal for units available in the new housing development at an affordable rent for the household.

For developers of residential projects, the Housing Crisis Act provides a number of new tools that can be utilized to eliminate certain roadblocks that local jurisdictions may attempt to put forward to delay or downsize their new housing projects. 

Next in the series is Assembly Bill 1485 Housing development: streamlining authored by Assembly member Buffy Wicks (D-Oakland).

Steven Vettel and Charles “CJ” Higley are real estate and land use partners in Farella Bran + Martel’s San Francisco office. Mr. Vettel can be reached at svettel /at/ fbm.com / 415.954.4902 and Mr. Higley can be reached at cjhigley /at/ fbm.com / 415.954.4942. 

West Coast Commercial Real Estate News